[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Darwin - chmod broken?
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: Darwin - chmod broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:21:31 +0200 |
mwoehlke <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'll investigate the other failures, but if I can demonstrate that a:
> the OS is broken, and b: the OS's version of the same utility is
> similarly broken, I'll just leave my reports at that (unless someone
> objects to this plan).
Fine by me, especially since I'm seeing no test failures on the
newer Darwin 8.7.0.
Thanks for playing along :-)
- Re: What to do with 'make check'?, (continued)
- Re: What to do with 'make check'?, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/26
- Re: What to do with 'make check'?, mwoehlke, 2006/09/26
- Re: What to do with 'make check'?, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/26
- Dawrin- why does pinky SIGBUS (was: What to do with 'make check'?), mwoehlke, 2006/09/26
- Re: Dawrin- why does pinky SIGBUS, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/27
- Re: Dawrin- why does pinky SIGBUS, mwoehlke, 2006/09/27
- Re: Dawrin- why does pinky SIGBUS, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/27
- Darwin - chmod broken? (was: What to do with 'make check'?), mwoehlke, 2006/09/26
- Re: Darwin - chmod broken?, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/27
- Re: Darwin - chmod broken?, mwoehlke, 2006/09/27
- Re: Darwin - chmod broken?,
Jim Meyering <=