[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Don't you think there are too many *sum utilities?
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Don't you think there are too many *sum utilities? |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:16:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.97 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden writes:
> One more comparison. Why do we have the only one 'mknod' utility and
> why don't we have separate 'bmknod' (for block devices) and 'cmknod'
> (for character devices)?
mknod is just a wrapper around the syscall, which does both.
> Do you fill the difference now?!
The alghrithms used by the sum programs are very different to each other.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Don't you think there are too many *sum utilities?, xandrous, 2007/04/08
- Re: Don't you think there are too many *sum utilities?, Mike Frysinger, 2007/04/08
- Re: Don't you think there are too many *sum utilities?, James Youngman, 2007/04/09
- Re: Don't you think there are too many *sum utilities?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/04/09
- Re: Don't you think there are too many *sum utilities?, Eric Blake, 2007/04/09
- Re: Don't you think there are too many *sum utilities?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/04/09
- Re: Don't you think there are too many *sum utilities?, Eric Blake, 2007/04/09
- Re: Don't you think there are too many *sum utilities?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/04/09
- Re: Don't you think there are too many *sum utilities?, Elias Pipping, 2007/04/09