[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:21:22 +0200 |
Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> I found another problem. The inotify version can't be used when --pid
> is specified. There are other inotify events that I want to investigate
> better if they can be used with --pid and in this case we can add them
> later when the inotify back end is stable enough for me to break it
> again :) What do you think?
Actually, there may be a nice way to allow --pid=PID to
integrate seamlessly with inotify support.
I think you can add an IN_DELETE_SELF inotify watch on the "/proc/PID"
directory. I suspect that every system with inotify support also
has usable /proc/PID directories. The only requirement seems to be
that the desired directory be readable.
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, (continued)
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/11
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2009/06/11
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/11
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/13
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2009/06/14
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/15
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Pádraig Brady, 2009/06/25
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/25
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Pádraig Brady, 2009/06/25
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/25
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2009/06/06
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/07