[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils
From: |
Voelker, Bernhard |
Subject: |
RE: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:38:49 +0100 |
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> I think it would rather fit into the coreutils than having it's own
>> distribution package. What do you think? (Source attached)
> ...
> Thanks for the suggestion, but it seems better to
> do that with some shell and perl:
regardless if it's written in C, shell+perl or any other language,
it's still the same question IMHO: should it go into coreutils?
+1 from me (for the C alternative, no deps to shell/perl etc.).
Have a nice day,
Berny
- Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Daniel Borkmann, 2010/01/06
- Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Jim Meyering, 2010/01/06
- Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Pádraig Brady, 2010/01/06
- RE: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils,
Voelker, Bernhard <=
- Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Jim Meyering, 2010/01/07
- Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Daniel Borkmann, 2010/01/07
- Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, C de-Avillez, 2010/01/07
- Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, Bob Proulx, 2010/01/07
- Re: Question about adding a tiny tool into GNU coreutils, C de-Avillez, 2010/01/07