[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion for rm(1)
From: |
Reuben Thomas |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion for rm(1) |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:20:30 +0000 |
On 10 March 2010 14:17, C de-Avillez <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:08:33 +0000
> Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> 2010/3/10 Pádraig Brady <address@hidden>:
>> > How about just doing: s/is usually/might be/
>>
>> That seems to me to go a little too far towards reassuring the user
>> that the data has probably gone. We want to say two not obviously
>> conflicting things:
>>
>> 1. After rm the data is most probably still there.
>>
>> 2. After rm it's probably quite a bit of trouble to recover it.
>>
>
> How about "... it might be possible, but not easy, to recover ..."?
I am also trying to convey the fact that an expert can offer recover
deleted data quickly *and* easily.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
- Suggestion for rm(1), Reuben Thomas, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Pádraig Brady, 2010/03/10
- RE: Suggestion for rm(1), Voelker, Bernhard, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Reuben Thomas, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), C de-Avillez, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1),
Reuben Thomas <=
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Keisial, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Reuben Thomas, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Keisial, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Reuben Thomas, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Eric Blake, 2010/03/10
- RE: Suggestion for rm(1), Voelker, Bernhard, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Keisial, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Eric Blake, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Reuben Thomas, 2010/03/12
- [PATCH] rm: tweak wording about loss of data warning, Eric Blake, 2010/03/17