[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Nov 2010 19:03:30 +0100 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 11/13/2010 02:45 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> Here's what I'm planning.
>
> Looks good, thanks, except for NEWS:
>
>> + a nanosecond-precision floating point time stamp for %X use %.X;
>
> It's fixed-point, not floating point, so I'd remove "floating point".
>
> And in coreutils.texi:
>
>> +precision, @command{stat} uses 9 digits, so @samp{%.X} is equivalent to
>> address@hidden When discarding excess precision, time stamps are truncated
>
> There's a period missing after the "@samp{%.9X}" (though ideally the sentence
> would be reworded so as to avoid the need for any period after the sample,
> as the "%.9X." looks bad when it's printed).
Thanks. Unfortunately, I received this about 20 minutes
too late to make those changes for the release.
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, (continued)
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Pádraig Brady, 2010/11/11
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Eric Blake, 2010/11/11
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Paul Eggert, 2010/11/11
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Pádraig Brady, 2010/11/11
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Jim Meyering, 2010/11/12
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Pádraig Brady, 2010/11/12
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Jim Meyering, 2010/11/12
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Paul Eggert, 2010/11/12
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Jim Meyering, 2010/11/13
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Paul Eggert, 2010/11/13
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s,
Jim Meyering <=
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Jim Meyering, 2010/11/13
- bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Paul Eggert, 2010/11/13
bug#7325: new test failure due to non-portability of printf formats like %05.3s, Pádraig Brady, 2010/11/03