bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#11100: Racy code in copy.c


From: Jim Meyering
Subject: bug#11100: Racy code in copy.c
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:40:25 +0200

Philipp Thomas wrote:
> I'd like to pass on observations from my collegue Neil Brown:
>
> in src/copy.c, copy_reg() is passed "bool *new_dst".
>
> This is 'false' if the file already exists, in which case it attempts to
> open the file with O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC | O_BINARY.
> If it is 'true', only then does it use O_CREAT (and others).
>
> Somewhere up the call chain - I'm not sure where - new_dst is set if 'stat'
> on the file succeeds.  The above mentioned code assumes that the file still
> exists.  This is racy - particularly for NFS where deletions from other
> clients can take a while to appear.

Thanks for the report.
However, much of what cp does is mandated by the POSIX spec, including
that inevitable-looking (POSIX-mandated) TOCTOU race.  Here's part of that
spec, from http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/cp.html:

    For each source_file, the following steps shall be taken:

        ...
        If source_file is of type directory, the following steps shall be taken:

            ...

        If source_file is of type regular file, the following steps
        shall be taken:

            The behavior is unspecified if dest_file exists and was
            written by a previous step. Otherwise, if dest_file exists,
            the following steps shall be taken:

                If the -i option is in effect, the cp utility shall
                write a prompt to the standard error and read a line from
                the standard input. If the response is not affirmative,
                cp shall do nothing more with source_file and go on to
                any remaining files.

                A file descriptor for dest_file shall be obtained by
                performing actions equivalent to the open() function
                defined in the System Interfaces volume of POSIX.1-2008
                called using dest_file as the path argument, and the
                bitwise-inclusive OR of O_WRONLY and O_TRUNC as the
                oflag argument.

                If the attempt to obtain a file descriptor fails and the
                -f option is in effect, cp shall attempt to remove the
                file by performing actions equivalent to the unlink()
                function defined in the System Interfaces volume
                of POSIX.1-2008 called using dest_file as the path
                argument. If this attempt succeeds, cp shall continue
                with step 3b.

            If dest_file does not exist, a file descriptor shall be
            obtained by performing actions equivalent to the open()
            function defined in the System Interfaces volume of
            POSIX.1-2008 called using dest_file as the path argument,
            and the bitwise-inclusive OR of O_WRONLY and O_CREAT as
            the oflag argument. The file permission bits of source_file
            shall be the mode argument.

            If the attempt to obtain a file descriptor fails, cp shall
            write a diagnostic message to standard error, do nothing
            more with source_file, and go on to any remaining files.

            The contents of source_file shall be written to the file
            descriptor. Any write errors shall cause cp to write a
            diagnostic message to standard error and continue to step 3e.

            The file descriptor shall be closed.

            The cp utility shall do nothing more with source_file. If
            a write error occurred in step 3d, it is unspecified if
            cp continues with any remaining files. If no write error
            occurred in step 3d, cp shall go on to any remaining files.

If you can find a way to make cp work sensibly in your specific case,
yet without impacting any other use case, please let us know.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]