[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11675: stty bad C semantics
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
bug#11675: stty bad C semantics |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:42:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 |
On 06/12/2012 01:13 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 04:47 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> it touches multiple places in the code
>
> Which other places? We do use = { FOO }
> to initialize in many places in the code, but
> I don't recall any other places that rely on
> initializing padding to zero.
Oh right, sorry.
So if this is the only instance then I
guess it's pragmatic to memset here
(with an appropriate comment).
It's still a bug I think in CIL,
so it would be great to report there too.
cheers,
Pádraig.
bug#11675: stty bad C semantics, Jim Meyering, 2012/06/12