bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k


From: Paul Eggert
Subject: bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 14:35:24 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6

On 06/01/2013 09:20 AM, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
>       What replaced it?
> 
>       I mean it doesn't do something *different*, it just ignores it.

I'm not sure what behavior you're asking for, but if you want
the old behavior of -k, you can use the --block-size=1KiB
option.  So no functionality was lost.

-k (and --block-size=1KiB) affects only the block size of
displayed values; it doesn't affect the choice of which
values to display.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]