[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#15869: Bug in seq command --separator option
|
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
|
Subject: |
bug#15869: Bug in seq command --separator option |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:44:12 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
forcemerge 13227 13493 14584 15869
stop
On 11/12/2013 08:01 AM, James Bowlin wrote:
> I'm using seq from the coreutils-8.20 package on Gentoo Linux.
>
> Here is the incorrect output
>
> $ seq -s, 1 5
> 1
> 2,3,4,5,%
>
> The newline comes after the "1" instead of after the "5". The "%"
> indicates the lack of a newline. A comma is lacking after the "1"
> and an extra comma was added after the "5".
>
> Here is the correct output from the busybox seq:
>
> $ busybox seq -s, 1 5
> 1,2,3,4,5
That was fixed in the coreutils-8.21 release (2013-02-14)
sorry for the trouble,
Pádraig.