bug#25388: Bug in ls, kills existing scripts reading "ls" -1 as input

[L A Walsh]

Eric Blake wrote:
> Good or not, it IS what happens, and we can't change it due to years of
> usage.
----
        You are coming into the middle of the discussion.
        I wasn't asking for a change to _that_ specific behavior.
        I'm against adding more/new behaviors that also change
output and do it by default.