[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts
From: |
Derek Robert Price |
Subject: |
Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 11:50:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Paul Edwards wrote:
|"Derek Robert Price" <derek@ximbiot.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.2823.1067528885.21628.bug-cvs@gnu.org...
|
|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|>Hash: SHA1
|>
|>Paul Edwards wrote:
|>
|>|>If you have any other functions that are not covered, please let us
know.
|>|
|>|
|>|E.g. fork() is provided? And if it is, it will work on any
|>|C89 compiler? Borland C++ 3.1 for DOS is 100%
|>|ISO-conforming. So is SAS/C for MVS (OS/390).
|>
|>These compilers don't provide access to system functions?
|
|
|There is no such system function on DOS or MVS.
|
|Ergo, any application relying on fork() being available is a
|long way from being portable.
You could have fooled me. CVS relies on fork() (or vfork()) and it sure
seems to run on a lot of platforms. That's been true for at least 8 years.
Derek
- --
~ *8^)
Email: derek@ximbiot.com
Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
- --
I will finish what I sta
I will finish what I sta
I will finish what I sta...
~ - Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/oUFnLD1OTBfyMaQRAhmhAJ4+XX1Or1vdYr3roxVRk2gj8Q+wAgCfXPU9
XqwDF+u+M1FLJHXkmLi+G+Q=
=uBMD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, (continued)
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/10/29
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Mihai Bazon, 2003/10/29
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/29
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/10/29
- Message not available
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Paul Edwards, 2003/10/29
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/10/29
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/30
- Message not available
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Paul Edwards, 2003/10/30
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/30
- Message not available
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Paul Edwards, 2003/10/30
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts,
Derek Robert Price <=
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Larry Jones, 2003/10/30
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/30
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/10/30
- Message not available
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Paul Edwards, 2003/10/30
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/30
- Message not available
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Paul Edwards, 2003/10/30
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Larry Jones, 2003/10/30
- RE: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Shaun Tancheff, 2003/10/30
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Derek Robert Price, 2003/10/31
- Message not available
- Re: different CVS_SERVER for different hosts, Paul Edwards, 2003/10/31