bug-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question: Windows Build - feature branch


From: Derek Robert Price
Subject: Re: Question: Windows Build - feature branch
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:47:11 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Conrad T. Pino wrote:

>>>Is adding a complete set distinctly named VC 6.0 build files and
keeping VC 5.0
>>>files in a semi-maintained state an option?
>
>
>I'd appreciate your opinion to the above question.


I suppose I wouldn't really have any objection to this if it appears
most convenient to the folks who have to use the files.

>Do you have any thoughts about MinGW http://www.mingw.org/?


Hadn't even heard of it before.  It looks like it is trying to do what
we want.  Have you tried to build CVS with it?

>>I haven't tried the DJGPP version of GCC yet.  It is possible that it
>>doesn't suffer from the same limitations as Cygwin.  If you have time to
>>research that and would like to report back, I would like to hear.
>
>
>DJGPP http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/ looks problematic since it's target OS
>is DOS, MS-DOS and compatibles.  The current Windows build targets the
Win32
>API and DJGPP targets the DOS API.  I'm concerned we lose too munch
function
>with the DOS API.


Windows still has support for DOS, and I'm fairly certain that the
command line version of CVS won't be making much use of Windows-specific
calls.  Some of the networking stuff might be tricky, but I'll be
suprised if that won't build just from what I heard when I used to lurk
on the Autoconf lists.

Derek

- --
                *8^)

Email: address@hidden

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAdFq+LD1OTBfyMaQRAlDQAKDSj4yQKf5sc5Zvp9LKVFxV2zczGwCg7PHJ
DYHeNakRXHvR+zlXHP1V9kI=
=SB9C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]