[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "P" status from update
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: "P" status from update |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:43:13 -0500 (EST) |
Frank Hemer writes:
>
> I assume this will in the same way affect the output of '-n update'?
>
> If so, please consider that this will cause compatibility issues with cvs
> frontends ...
No, it won't.
> The U/P in this case provides some extra information:
> U: new file
> P: file already there but new revision
That is not correct -- the server is always at liberty to do a regular
update rather than a patch. The current code compares the size of the
patch and the size of the actual file and sends whichever is smaller.
-Larry Jones
I always send Grandma a thank-you note right away. ...Ever since she
sent me that empty box with the sarcastic note saying she was just
checking to see if the Postal Service was still working. -- Calvin
- "P" status from update, Derek R. Price, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Larry Jones, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Derek R. Price, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Larry Jones, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Derek R. Price, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Rahul Bhargava, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Larry Jones, 2005/11/14
- Re: "P" status from update, Mark D. Baushke, 2005/11/15
- Re: "P" status from update, Frank Hemer, 2005/11/15
- Re: "P" status from update,
Larry Jones <=
- Re: "P" status from update, Jim Hyslop, 2005/11/15