bug-fileutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: core with ln command


From: Bob Proulx
Subject: Re: core with ln command
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 11:31:46 -0600
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

> Hie, I'm french, so excuse me if my english is not perfect.

I would not apologize.  Your english is better than many native
speakers.

> I've been using cygwin/Xfree since the 4.1 version of Xfree, and I
> enjoy its product. I try the new version which package cygwin and
> Xfree 4.2.0.1 in the same setup. And I have a problem with ln command.

The hard work the Cygwin team has put in to developing the GNU Project
on Windows is greatly admired. However the GNU team generally uses GNU
Operating Systems and do not have access to Cygwin systems or
MS-Windows systems which means that most of us can't help you. It
would be most appreciated if you would make your bug report directly
to the Cygwin folks. They are the experts and best suited to handle
your problem.

    http://cygwin.com/
        Cygwin Home Page
    http://cygwin.com/faq/
        Cygwin FAQ. Most excellent!
    http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
        Cygwin Bug Report Guidelines. This is a good reference for
        general bug reporting.

> The symbolic link is ok, but not the physical link. In the old version,
> I hadn't the problem.

I did not even realize that ms-windows supported links, hard or soft!
I learn something new every day.  (Really I expect this to be magic
that the Cygwin folks have pulled off to even make this partially
work on ms-windows.)

Bob

> Here is an example of my test :
> 
> $ cd /bin
> 
> $ ls -l df*
> -rwxr-xr-x    1 Admin    Aucun       39936 Jun 15  2001 df.exe
> 
> $ ln df.exe df1.exe
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> 
> $ cat ln.exe.sta*
> Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=77F348B5
> eax=00000000 ebx=02423328 ecx=FFFFFFFF edx=FFFFFFFF esi=0000000C edi=0000000C
> ebp=0241F440 esp=0241F414 program=d:\cygwin\bin\ln.exe
> cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs=0000 ss=0023
> Stack trace:
> Frame     Function  Args
> 0241F440  77F348B5  (00000000, 00000000, 0000000C, FFFFFFFF)
> 0241FD60  6107120A  (61683890, 616838B8, 0241FE20, 00401D49)
> 0241FE20  00401EE3  (61683890, 616838B8, 0241FEB0, 00402BB8)
> 0241FEB0  004032C3  (00000003, 61682738, 0A010278, 0241FEE4)
> 0241FF00  61005A9E  (610C095C, FFFFFFFE, 000000A0, 610C08A0)
> 0241FF60  61005D28  (00000000, 00000000, 807FD0F3, 80F92BCC)
> 0241FF90  0040EB3B  (00402BA4, 0000000A, 00000246, 8011748B)
> 0241FFC0  0040103D  (0022E430, 0022E3C2, 7FFDF000, 7FFDF000)
> 0241FFF0  77F1BA06  (00401000, 00000000, 000000B0, 00000100)
> End of stack trace
> 
> $ ln -s df.exe df1.exe
> 
> $ ls -l df*
> -rwxr-xr-x    1 Admin    Aucun       39936 Jun 15  2001 df.exe
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 Admin    Aucun          92 Jul  5 10:55 df1.exe -> df.exe
> 
> The symbolic link is ok, but not the physical link. In the old version,
> I hadn't the problem.
> 
> Have a good day.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]