[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: findutils on interix
From: |
Markus Duft |
Subject: |
Re: findutils on interix |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:08:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100913 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.3 |
On 10/28/2010 12:03 PM, James Youngman wrote:
[snip]
> In so far as we're likely ever to fix this problem I'd be inclined to
> go for the 32K limit that Eric suggested. And perhaps treating
> ENOMEM like E2BIG when execve fails, for Interix.
mhm - that'd be ok with me.
another solution that came to my mind: i'm maintaining a library, who's sole
purpose is to fix the incorrect behaviour of libc in some regards on interix
(libsuacomp [1]). it does some "bad" things already ( ;p ), so maybe i could
override the sysconf() function (it already overrides approx 70 functions...),
and make it return a sane value in the _SC_ARG_MAX case. that would make the
whole problem disappear, and even the first (pushed) patch unnecessary.
what do you think?
[1] http://sf.net/projects/suacomp
markus
>
> James.
- Re: findutils on interix, (continued)
- Re: findutils on interix, James Youngman, 2010/10/23
- Re: findutils on interix, Markus Duft, 2010/10/27
- Re: findutils on interix, Markus Duft, 2010/10/27
- Re: findutils on interix, James Youngman, 2010/10/27
- Re: findutils on interix, Eric Blake, 2010/10/27
- Re: findutils on interix, Markus Duft, 2010/10/28
- Re: findutils on interix, Markus Duft, 2010/10/28
- Re: findutils on interix, James Youngman, 2010/10/28
- Re: findutils on interix, Markus Duft, 2010/10/28
- Re: findutils on interix, James Youngman, 2010/10/28
- Re: findutils on interix,
Markus Duft <=
- Re: findutils on interix, Markus Duft, 2010/10/28
- Re: findutils on interix, Eric Blake, 2010/10/28
- Re: findutils on interix, Markus Duft, 2010/10/28
- Re: findutils on interix, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/10/29
Re: findutils on interix, James Youngman, 2010/10/27