[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] How does awk implement extremely long integers?
From: |
John Haque |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] How does awk implement extremely long integers? |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:14:47 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Hi.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:53:30AM -0700, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote:
> All gawk implementations (gawk, nawk, awk, mawk, tawk, jawk, ...) by
> default use a numeric type implemented as a double, which on modern
> systems is always the IEEE 754 64-bit format. It has a 53-bit
> significand, with a separate sign, so numbers in the range
> [0, 2**53 - 1] can be represented exactly.
>
> For the applications for which awk was intended, that is mostly adequate.
> I have private versions of mawk and nawk that have been extended for
> 80-bit and 128-bit long double IEEE 754 formats, and also for 128-bit
> IEEE 754-2008 decimal arithmetic. See
>
> http://www.math.utah.edu/pub/mathcw/
I assume the modified gcc has additional format specifiers to print
"long" integers?
The GNU mpfr library does not have any built-in facility
to output "long" integers what I tell after looking at the online
doc. BTW, if I am not mistaken, gawk used to print long integers as
floating point numbers in the old days. Is this going to be an issue
for gawk?
$ gawk --version
GNU Awk 3.1.5
$ gawk 'BEGIN { print 1000*342413245}'
3.42413e+11
Thanks,
John
- Re: [bug-gawk] How does awk implement extremely long integers?,
John Haque <=