Re: [bug-gawk] gawk bug report: SIGPIPE reset not effective

[Ian Jackson]

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [bug-gawk] gawk bug report: SIGPIPE reset not 
effective"):
> address@hidden writes ("Re: [bug-gawk] gawk bug report: SIGPIPE reset not 
> effective"):
> > Thanks for your note. You did not include your proposed patch; please
> > send it on and I'll try to review.
> 
> Sorry - here you go.

What did you think ?  Would you like me to send a better version of
this patch and if so:

 * Should I try to fix the portability code for EMX (whatever that is)
   and MinGW32 too ?  (I have no way to even build test the result.)

 * Should I refactor the "os_setbinmode" pattern found at the two call
   sites in my patch, to hava an "os_before_child" and
   "os_after_child", or something ?  If so what should I call these
   two functions ?

Thanks,
Ian.