[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH]
From: |
arnold |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH] |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Apr 2017 01:41:58 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 23:47:58 +0200
> > From: <address@hidden>
> > CC: <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
> >
> > >> 0xC000014B STATUS_PIPE_BROKEN
> > >>
> > >> Do you really think "invalid handle" better conveys that meaning ?
> > >
> > > Yes, because AFAIK STATUS_PIPE_BROKEN is a status returned by device
> > > drivers, not by programs.
> >
> > So, you'd draw a hard line between the two values 0xC0000008 and 0xC000014B
> > ?
>
> I'm drawing a line where the EXCEPTION_* values defined in winbase.h
> header end. All the other values are AFAIK never triggered by fatal
> exceptions that cause abnormal program termination.
>
> > Seriously, that looks like some ego-driven quest now.
>
> Not on my side. I was just answering your questions.
Hi All.
Eli - thanks for fix. Alexandre, thanks for the discussion.
It's clear there isn't a perfect mapping here. This looks like
a reasonable compromise.
Let's close off the discussion now, please.
Thanks,
Arnold
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH],
arnold <=
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/09