[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] Bug in gawk big num
|
From: |
Andrew J. Schorr |
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] Bug in gawk big num |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:54:20 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:42:51AM -0400, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 08:11:26AM -0600, address@hidden wrote:
> > I think you have to check `base == 10' since base could also be 8.
>
> Well, I think "E" is unlikely to appear in any base < 15. :-)
By the way, in awkgram.y, this works for numeric constants in the program
because we don't set 'seen_e' if 'inhex' was set.
Regards,
Andy
Re: [bug-gawk] Bug in gawk big num, arnold, 2018/09/26
Re: [bug-gawk] Bug in gawk big num, arnold, 2018/09/27