[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] array initialization
|
From: |
arnold |
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] array initialization |
|
Date: |
Sat, 05 Jan 2019 11:30:29 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 |
"Andrew J. Schorr" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is there a way to do this properly? This two-step process seems to work:
> y[1][1] = 0
> split("", y[1])
> But that's rather cumbersome...
That's it for the moment. Backwards compat requires it to work this way.
If you can think of something better we can discuss it.
Thanks,
Arnold
- Re: [bug-gawk] array initialization, (continued)
- Re: [bug-gawk] array initialization, Andrew J. Schorr, 2019/01/05
- Re: [bug-gawk] useless array length abstraction, Andrew J. Schorr, 2019/01/05
- Re: [bug-gawk] useless array length abstraction, arnold, 2019/01/06
- Re: [bug-gawk] useless array length abstraction, Andrew J. Schorr, 2019/01/06
- Re: [bug-gawk] useless array length abstraction, arnold, 2019/01/06
- Re: [bug-gawk] useless array length abstraction, Andrew J. Schorr, 2019/01/06
- Re: [bug-gawk] array methods belong in a struct, not an array, Andrew J. Schorr, 2019/01/06
- Re: [bug-gawk] array methods belong in a struct, not an array, arnold, 2019/01/06
- Re: [bug-gawk] array initialization, arnold, 2019/01/05
- Re: [bug-gawk] array initialization, Andrew J. Schorr, 2019/01/05
Re: [bug-gawk] array initialization,
arnold <=