[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gettext] replacing autotools with meson?
From: |
Petr Ovtchenkov |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gettext] replacing autotools with meson? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Aug 2017 17:03:23 +0300 |
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:41:43 +0300
Alexander Kanavin <address@hidden> wrote:
> ...
> Which brings us to gettext. It is on a critical path for almost anything
> (in the dependency tree it comes shortly after building the
> cross-compilation C toolchain, including cross-gcc, and is needed for
> almost anything else). So watching how it takes several minutes to
> configure itself, while nothing else can proceed in the build is not a
> good use of time, and we would like to solve this bottleneck. Similarly,
> we run automated builds (for multiple common architectures and
> scenarios) several times a day to establish that new changes don't cause
> breakage, and want to make those faster as well.
>
> For what its worth we can build a complete Linux system, including the
> gcc cross toolchain used during the build in around 1-1.5 hours
> depending on the build hardware used.
>
>
Then you try to add extremely unstable build framework that based on
python (that itself has many incompatible variations and has problems with
cross-compiling) --- for important component, right?
Hmm, thanks, I would prefer to spend a few minutes with current process.
WBR,
--
- ptr