[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Don't have widec.h
From: |
Andreas Jaeger |
Subject: |
Re: Don't have widec.h |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:17:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence, i386-suse-linux) |
Frank Schafer <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I did a custom build of glibc-2.2.4. with gcc-2.95.3 ( patched for
> glibc2 ).
>
> GCC configuration for the glibc-build:
>
> # ../gcc-2.95.3/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-languages=c,c++
> --disable-nls --disable-shared --enable-threads=posix
> # make BOOT_LDFLAGS=-static bootstrap
>
> GLIBC configuration:
>
> # # unpacking the glibc-linuxthreads addon
> # ../glibc-2.2.3/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-add-ons
> --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
Did you run make install?
> The configuration for the final GCC build went like this:
>
> # ../gcc-2.95.3/configure --prefix=/usr
> --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/g++ --enable-threads \
>> --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,objc
> # make bootstrap
>
> ( The last shouldn't be of interest here - of course. )
>
> I'm missing the file `wchar.h` on my system, and thus I'm missing all
> the `wcs*` functions.
> I see all this in `glibc-2.2.4/wcsmbs` ( function definitions and
> `wchar.h` ).
>
> Can anyone tell me, why this don't get installed with the above
> configuration ( Or have we another nasty
<wchar.h> gets installed by glibc's make install. If not, something
else is broken in your glibc installation.
> GCC - GLIBC incompatibility like the `atof()` one ( ficed by the patch )
> ? )
Nope.
> Is there a mailing list for GLIBC ?
This one for example ;-)
>
> Excuse, I can't run `glibcbug` because I prefer `vi` over `emacs`, thus
> haven't `emacs` installed.
Run next time:
EDITOR=vi glibcbug
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs address@hidden
private address@hidden
http://www.suse.de/~aj