[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: plug-in parser's output
From: |
Shigio Yamaguchi |
Subject: |
Re: plug-in parser's output |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:54:22 +0900 |
> However, I don't consider it worthless that ctags and etags
> can be used as parser.
Right. It's a trade-off.
> How about adding a converter from `tags' or `TAGS' to `GTAGS'
> as alternative of the command layer plug-in?
Though it is not a bad idea, depending on external commands brings
a lot of annoyingness.
Do you think both the plug-in parser and the converter are needed?
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
- plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/07
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/07
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/07
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/18
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/18
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/19
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/20
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/20
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/20
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/07/20
- Re: plug-in parser's output, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/07/20