Re: GNU GLOBAL skips indexing of inline functions in files having C++ support macros

[Hirohito Kato]

Thank you for reply.

I understand that rewriting parser by flex is more important
 issue on the project than typical change. I think so, too.

Now I try to modify the source code in order to ignore 'extern "C"'
 sentence like namespace token.
If I do it, can I send a patch of it to you?

Regards,


Shigio YAMAGUCHI-2 wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
> Hirohito Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
> Hello,
> 
>> I have a question of this issue.
>> Is this problem difficult to be fixed?
>> 
>> Though the priority of it seems to be very low, I would like to know
>>  why the problem isn't fixed for a long time.
>> (It is important problem for me...)
>>
>> I appreciate it if you could answer my question.
> 
> I cannot promise to fix the problem right now. I rather would like to
> rewrite the C++ parser using flex, because the current parser is hard
> to maintain. But I couldn't secure enough time for it. :<
> 
> However, you need not wait for it; you can fix the problem by yourself.
> If you fix it, would you please post it to this mailing list?
> 
> I understood the importance of C++ by your mail.
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-global mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/GNU-GLOBAL-skips-indexing-of-inline-functions-in-files-having-C%2B%2B-support-macros-tp11539370p20339614.html
Sent from the Gnu - Global - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.