[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Plug-in parser speed
From: |
Jason Hood |
Subject: |
Plug-in parser speed |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:45:54 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
On Windows, ctags is somewhat slower and pygments is considerably slower. Is
this something I should be looking at, or are other OSes comparable? For a
test, just consider the C files from the 6.3.2 release:
===============================================
C:\test>bsdtar -xf global-6.3.2.tar.gz *.c
C:\test>gtags
C:\test>gtags --stat
period elapsed[sec]
---------------------------------- ------------
Time of creating GTAGS and GRTAGS. 0.082
Time of flushing B-tree cache 0.106
---------------------------------- ------------
The entire time 0.188
C:\test>gtags --stat --gtagslabel=ctags
period elapsed[sec]
---------------------------------- ------------
Time of creating GTAGS and GRTAGS. 0.503
Time of flushing B-tree cache 0.088
---------------------------------- ------------
The entire time 0.591
C:\test>gtags --stat --gtagslabel=pygments
period elapsed[sec]
---------------------------------- ------------
Time of creating GTAGS and GRTAGS. 6.007
Time of flushing B-tree cache 0.138
---------------------------------- ------------
The entire time 6.145
===============================================
(BTW, Python 2.7.8 & 3.4.2 were about the same, but 3.3.0 was another second
slower.)
--
Jason.
- Plug-in parser speed,
Jason Hood <=