[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gne]the problem of illegal content vs. freedom
|
From: |
Mike Warren |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gne]the problem of illegal content vs. freedom |
|
Date: |
14 Feb 2001 10:53:02 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) |
Jean-Daniel Fekete <address@hidden> writes:
> Now, if everybody does that, the level of
> shininess/rudeness/acceptance will vary. Still, most people will
> feel very bad if GNE contains articles on how to kill, rape,
> manipulate, etc. Even if you personnaly don't care.
How many classifications would include such articles?
--
address@hidden
<URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A 0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD
RE: [Bug-gne]the problem of illegal content vs. freedom, Peteris Paikens, 2001/02/14
Re: [Bug-gne]the problem of illegal content vs. freedom, Mehdi Tibouchi, 2001/02/14
Re: [Bug-gne]the problem of illegal content vs. freedom, Christopher Mahan, 2001/02/14
Re: [Bug-gne]the problem of illegal content vs. freedom, Oliver Denzel, 2001/02/14
Re: [Bug-gne]the problem of illegal content vs. freedom, Christopher Mahan, 2001/02/14
- [Bug-gne]Allowing "unsavoury" content, Tom Chance, 2001/02/14
- Re: [Bug-gne]Allowing "unsavoury" content, Jimmy Wales, 2001/02/15
- Re: [Bug-gne]Allowing "unsavoury" content, Tom Chance, 2001/02/16
- Re: [Bug-gne]Allowing "unsavoury" content, Jimmy Wales, 2001/02/16
- Re: [Bug-gne]Allowing "unsavoury" content, Tom Chance, 2001/02/16
- Re: [Bug-gne]Allowing "unsavoury" content, Bob Dodd, 2001/02/16
Re: [Bug-gne]Allowing "unsavoury" content, Soam Vasani, 2001/02/16
Re: [Bug-gne]Allowing "unsavoury" content, Tom Chance, 2001/02/16