[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unicode in emacs 21
From: |
Jason Rumney |
Subject: |
Re: unicode in emacs 21 |
Date: |
28 Oct 2001 00:41:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1.50 |
mgk25@cam.ac.uk (Markus Kuhn) writes:
> Using UTF-8 as the internal Emacs encoding is one way of achieving
> continued guaranteed binary transparency, coming up with a tricky encoding
> for malformed UTF-8 sequences is another one. I favour the former
> approach, which is also what other UTF-8 capable modern editors do today.
Which other editors? Most I am aware of use UTF-16 as their internal
encoding, unless it is just blind no-conversion 8-bit editors you are
talking about.
--
Jason Rumney
- unicode in emacs 21, Oliver Doepner, 2001/10/25
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, David Starner, 2001/10/27
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Janusz S. Bień, 2001/10/28
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Dave Love, 2001/10/28
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/29
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/29