bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Hollow cursor even if cursor-in-non-selected-windows is nil


From: Raymond Scholz
Subject: Hollow cursor even if cursor-in-non-selected-windows is nil
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 16:43:15 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)

This bug report will be sent to the Free Software Foundation,
not to your local site managers!
Please write in English, because the Emacs maintainers do not have
translators to read other languages for them.

Your bug report will be posted to the address@hidden mailing list,
and to the gnu.emacs.bug news group.

In GNU Emacs 21.1.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars)
 of 2001-10-22 on valzone
configured using `configure  --prefix=/usr --with-pop --with-gcc 
--libexecdir=/usr/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info 
--sharedstatedir=/var/lib --localstatedir=/var/lib --with-tiff --with-xpm 
--with-jpeg --with-png --with-x --with-x-toolkit=athena --with-gif 
--enable-ipv6 i386-debian-linux-gnu'
Important settings:
  value of $LC_ALL: nil
  value of $LC_COLLATE: de_DE
  value of $LC_CTYPE: de_DE
  value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil
  value of $LC_MONETARY: de_DE
  value of $LC_NUMERIC: de_DE
  value of $LC_TIME: de_DE
  value of $LANG: POSIX
  locale-coding-system: iso-latin-1
  default-enable-multibyte-characters: t

Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug
and the precise symptoms of the bug:

,----[ NEWS ]
| ** When using a windowing terminal, each Emacs window now has a cursor
| of its own.  By default, when a window is selected, the cursor is
| solid; otherwise, it is hollow.  The user-option
| `cursor-in-non-selected-windows' controls how to display the
| cursor in non-selected windows.  If nil, no cursor is shown, if
| non-nil a hollow box cursor is shown.
`----

I've set `cursor-in-non-selected-windows' to `nil'.  But if 
`cursor-in-echo-area' is `t', I can see hollow cursors in non-selected
buffers.  This looks like an inconsistency to me.

Cheers, Ray
-- 
Raymond Scholz - address@hidden - PGP - http://www.zonix.de/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]