Re: bind me a/k/a leadership in the key binding dept.

[Miles Bader]

jidanni@dman.ddts.net (Dan Jacobson) writes:
> Anyways, say, you provide functions with standard names, no?  You
> don't just do "lambda" and let the masses "chose their favorite name
> as the flower blows", no?  Well, how about the same leadership in the
> key binding dept.

It's much simpler to do for function names, because the namespace is
much, _much_, larger (well, the _practical_ namespace, anyway; you could
always think of `M-x name' as a binding...).

-Miles
-- 
`There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
 Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.'