[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(emacs)Glossary::. Definition of "copyleft" excludes many free software
(emacs)Glossary::. Definition of "copyleft" excludes many free software supporters
Mon, 02 Dec 2002 17:33:42 -0600
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021128
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Bug Report for GNU Emacs Manual, 15th ed. (for GNU Emacs 21.2)
Definition of "copyleft" in the glossary is a confusing pun and
excludes many free software supporters
The definition appears as follows in Info:
A copyleft is a notice giving the public legal permission to
redistribute a program or other work of art. Copylefts are used
by left-wing programmers to promote freedom and cooperation, just
as copyrights are used by right-wing programmers to gain power
over other people.
This has some side-effects for some users (if not all).
** Alienation/insult of free software supporter
Usually only occurs if user is a liberal (as in American conservative
** Logic exception at stereotyping
Experienced by those who don't paint everybody with one single
political color or the other.
Two methods here:
** Info node (emacs)Glossary
Run an incremental search for "Copyleft".
** Paper manual, section Glossary
Turn to page 537, and find the definition for "Copyleft".
While it may be a humorous pun to tie copy_left_ to _left_-wing, and
copy_right_ (implying proprietary status in this usage) to
_right_-wing, I hardly think it is accurate.
As a right-winger, I don't fit into the perfect mold this definition
seems to create, as I'm sure the left-wingers reading this don't feel
they fit into a perfect mold either. I believe in small government
(least is best), laissez-faire, truly free trade (no barriers), and
property rights (which do not include copyright, BTW) -- though not as
"the highest moral principle", as RMS asserts in his comments to
Roderick Long's `The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property
Rights'. I am also pro-choice, against "homeland security" privacy
violations, against "family values" legislation -- here I would say
"just as you left-wingers are", but I'm not going to typecast like
And, I find the current copyright situation -- including that for
software -- highly unfavorable. For myself, and for others as well.
Finally, I believe that most of the so-called "left-wing" principles
(listed above) are more compatible with the basic tenets of
libertarianism (or liberalism, or conservatism as they call it in the
U.S.) are more compatible with the right-wing than the left-wing!
Which is why I have chosen this "side".
If you've made this connection in deference to the left=left,
right=right, then I believe you've made the wrong kind of statement.
Copyleft, if my reading of the history of the term is correct, is a
play on the word "copyright": while not accurately opposing, as the
"right" in "copyright" refers to a concept of rights (albeit
inaccurate), not the direction, a humorous and catchy term
Using the logic on which this depends, however, I could just as
accurately say that since free software is about securing the _right_s
of users to copy, modify, and distribute software, then it must be a
_right_-wing principle, along with all principles dealing with
Please fix this.
Also known as S11001001
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org
Sometimes I think that perhaps one of the best things I could do with
my life is: find a gigantic pile of proprietary software that was a
trade secret, and start handing out copies on a street corner so it
wouldn't be a trade secret any more, and perhaps that would be a much
more efficient way for me to give people new free software than
actually writing it myself; but everyone is too cowardly to even take
-- RMS, Lecture at KTH (Sweden), 30 October 1986
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- (emacs)Glossary::. Definition of "copyleft" excludes many free software supporters,
Stephen Compall <=