[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Configure/compile failure on Solaris 10 Sparc Ultra 25
From: |
Glasser, Nathan |
Subject: |
RE: Configure/compile failure on Solaris 10 Sparc Ultra 25 |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:30:47 -0400 |
>I'm a bit confused. Are you saying it does _not_ work if you use "cc
>-E" as the preprocessor?
I wasn't saying that at all. I wasn't well enough versed with the
Emacs build procedure to know how to set what it uses for the
preprocessor for cofigure.
I just knew the symbol was missing; I found a kludge way to put it back
that
seemed to work; the root cause seemed to have to do with the
preprocessor, but
I didn't know how to try changing it.
>Does it work if you use "cc -E -Xs", making sure the "cc" is the same
one as
>your compiler?
Yes. I defined CPP to be that, and it fully configured, compiled,
linked,
etc. just fine.
I did not try 22.0.97 or 98, but I'll try that if you still want me to.
Thanks,
Nathan
- Configure/compile failure on Solaris 10 Sparc Ultra 25, Glasser, Nathan, 2007/04/15
- Re: Configure/compile failure on Solaris 10 Sparc Ultra 25, Glenn Morris, 2007/04/15
- RE: Configure/compile failure on Solaris 10 Sparc Ultra 25,
Glasser, Nathan <=
- Re: Configure/compile failure on Solaris 10 Sparc Ultra 25, Glenn Morris, 2007/04/17
- Re: Configure/compile failure on Solaris 10 Sparc Ultra 25, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/18
- Re: Configure/compile failure on Solaris 10 Sparc Ultra 25, Glenn Morris, 2007/04/18
- RE: Configure/compile failure on Solaris 10 Sparc Ultra 25, Glasser, Nathan, 2007/04/19
- Re: Configure/compile failure on Solaris 10 Sparc Ultra 25, Glenn Morris, 2007/04/18