[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#731: 23.0.60; Varying point position after undo
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#731: 23.0.60; Varying point position after undo |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:59:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
> Hmm.. the comment seems to say that calling it is just redundant,
> whereas this thread shows that it can actually be harmful.
> Could you improve the comment so as to explain why it's harmful?
I checked it in with a slightly more accurate comment. IMHO, however,
last_boundary_buffer and last_boundary_position should be documented
better. In particular, I don't understand the comment near the end of
record_point saying
/* If we are just after an undo boundary, and
point wasn't at start of deleted range, record where it was. */
BTW, why isn't there a separate last_boundary_position for each buffer?
martin
- bug#731: 23.0.60; Varying point position after undo, cyd, 2008/09/18
- bug#731: 23.0.60; Varying point position after undo, Markus Triska, 2008/09/19
- bug#731: 23.0.60; Varying point position after undo, martin rudalics, 2008/09/19
- bug#731: 23.0.60; Varying point position after undo, Markus Triska, 2008/09/19
- bug#731: 23.0.60; Varying point position after undo, martin rudalics, 2008/09/21
- bug#731: 23.0.60; Varying point position after undo, Markus Triska, 2008/09/21
- bug#731: 23.0.60; Varying point position after undo, Stefan Monnier, 2008/09/21
- bug#731: 23.0.60; Varying point position after undo,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#731: 23.0.60; Varying point position after undo, Stefan Monnier, 2008/09/23