|
From: | Emacs bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#1264: marked as done ("obsolete" are too early in load-path) |
Date: | Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:10:04 -0700 |
Your message dated Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:00:19 -0400 with message-id <87bpx19ad8.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> and subject line Re: "obsolete" are too early in load-path has caused the Emacs bug report #1264, regarding "obsolete" are too early in load-path to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com immediately.) -- 1264: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1264 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: "obsolete" are too early in load-path Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:36:18 -0700 (PDT) "obsolete" should be just about at the end of the list, it's not exactly where popular files reside...
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: "obsolete" are too early in load-path Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:00:19 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu> writes: > Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> writes: > > > > "obsolete" should be just about at the end of the list, it's not > > > exactly where popular files reside... > > > > startup.el sets the load patch in reverse alphabetical order. Does it > > matter in practice? > > For each file loaded there might be 6 extra stat system calls. OK, I changed update-subdirs to put the obsolete/ directory last.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |