|
From: | Emacs bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#2608: marked as done (23.0.90; `w32-use-visible-system-carat' should be a defcustom) |
Date: | Mon, 25 May 2009 01:20:05 +0000 |
Your message dated Mon, 25 May 2009 09:10:47 +0800 with message-id <4A19F017.2090104@gnu.org> and subject line Re: bug#2608: 23.0.90;`w32-use-visible-system-carat' should be a defcustom has caused the Emacs bug report #2608, regarding 23.0.90; `w32-use-visible-system-carat' should be a defcustom to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com immediately.) -- 2608: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=2608 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: 23.0.90; `w32-use-visible-system-carat' should be a defcustom Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 23:55:42 -0700 A visually impaired new Emacs user just asked a question about this variable on help-emacs-windows@gnu.org. I had never heard of this variable. I see now that it is a defvar, even though it seems to be documented as a user "flag". Seems like it should be a defcustom. In GNU Emacs 23.0.90.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2009-02-01 on SOFT-MJASON Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)'
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#2608: 23.0.90;`w32-use-visible-system-carat' should be a defcustom Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:10:47 +0800 User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) Drew Adams wrote:I don't see this as fixed in 23.0.94.1. I'm looking at both the doc string and the Emacs manual section about this variable.Drew, can you please stop reopening bugs because the solution is not EXACTLY what you want.At least explain what it is that is missing so we can have a clue what it is you are not happy with.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |