bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#3504: marked as done (23.0.94; Non-standard key notation in Ada manu


From: Emacs bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#3504: marked as done (23.0.94; Non-standard key notation in Ada manual)
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:45:05 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:40:03 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: 23.0.94; Non-standard key notation in Ada manual
has caused the Emacs bug report #3504,
regarding 23.0.94; Non-standard key notation in Ada manual
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact address@hidden
immediately.)


-- 
3504: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3504
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 23.0.94; Non-standard key notation in Ada manual Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:02:35 -0700
Just happened to notice that at least some of the Ada manual uses a
non-standard key-sequence notation.  See node `No project files'
(which should probably be `No Project Files':
 
 <C-x `> (on a PC keyboard, <`> is next to <1>)
 
That should probably be `C-x `', not <C-x `>.
 
Not sure how the keyboard keys ` and 1 should be notated - perhaps
like this? (on a PC keyboard, ``' is next to `1')

In GNU Emacs 23.0.94.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2009-05-24 on SOFT-MJASON
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)'
 



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: 23.0.94; Non-standard key notation in Ada manual Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:40:03 -0400
> Just happened to notice that at least some of the Ada manual uses a
> non-standard key-sequence notation.

Fixed, thanks.

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]