bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#4069: marked as done (23.1.50; whitespace.el)


From: Emacs bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#4069: marked as done (23.1.50; whitespace.el)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 01:35:04 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:28:22 -0400
with message-id <87prawo8cp.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>
and subject line Re: 23.1.50; whitespace.el
has caused the Emacs bug report #4069,
regarding 23.1.50; whitespace.el
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
4069: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4069
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 23.1.50; whitespace.el Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:31:18 -0400
There is a problem with whitespace-cleanup, when called before
whitespace-turn-on.  The buffer-local variable
whitespace-indentation-regexp doesn't get updated to correspond to the
buffer-local value of indent-tabs-mode.  This means that even if
indent-tabs-mode is nil, a line with text following a single tab
character will not be converted into a line of text following 8 space
characters when whitespace-cleanup is called.  There is a simple
work-around -- just turn whitespace on and off again to set the
buffer-local variables:

(defun my-whitespace-cleanup ()
  "Fixes a bug in whitespace-cleanup in which buffer-local
indent-tabs-mode is not respected."
  (interactive)
  (whitespace-turn-on) ;; sets buffer-local variables
  (whitespace-turn-off) ;; don't actually want the mode to be on
  (whitespace-cleanup))

Here are instructions to replicate the problem:

Start up with no .emacs.  Set indent-tabs-mode to nil.  Make sure
'indentation is in whitespace-style.  Insert a tab character into a
buffer with no spaces after it, e.g. the line could be "\tfoo".  Run
whitespace-cleanup in the buffer.  Note that the tab character is still
there.  Now run my-whitespace-cleanup.  Note that the tab character has
been replaced by spaces.

The fact that indent-tabs-mode is buffer-local is important.  For
example, makefile-mode sets it to true since tabs are a necessary part
of the syntax of make files.

In GNU Emacs 23.1.50.8 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.10.4)
 of 2009-08-03 on nyc-qws-005
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.70101000
Important settings:
  value of $LC_ALL: nil
  value of $LC_COLLATE: nil
  value of $LC_CTYPE: nil
  value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil
  value of $LC_MONETARY: nil
  value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil
  value of $LC_TIME: nil
  value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8
  value of $XMODIFIERS: nil
  locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix
  default-enable-multibyte-characters: t

Major mode: GNUmakefile

Minor modes in effect:
  shell-dirtrack-mode: t
  flyspell-mode: t
  desktop-save-mode: t
  diff-auto-refine-mode: t
  partial-completion-mode: t
  dynamic-completion-mode: t
  show-paren-mode: t
  recentf-mode: t
  iswitchb-mode: t
  global-auto-revert-mode: t
  tooltip-mode: t
  mouse-wheel-mode: t
  file-name-shadow-mode: t
  global-font-lock-mode: t
  font-lock-mode: t
  global-auto-composition-mode: t
  auto-composition-mode: t
  auto-encryption-mode: t
  auto-compression-mode: t
  column-number-mode: t
  line-number-mode: t
  transient-mark-mode: t

Load-path shadows:
/mnt/global/dev/lib/elisp/inf-caml hides 
/mnt/global/dev/lib/elisp/caml-mode/inf-caml
/mnt/global/dev/lib/elisp/tuareg-mode/camldebug hides 
/mnt/global/dev/lib/elisp/caml-mode/camldebug


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: 23.1.50; whitespace.el Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:28:22 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Vinicius Jose Latorre <viniciusjl@ig.com.br> writes:

> I already sent back an answer to Craig.
>
> This is neither a bug nor a problem, Craig had implemented a wrong
> function to do what he wanted.
>
> Should I send to you and emacsbugs list all the emails about this
> conversation?

No need.  Next time, please try to keep the bug list in the CC's, so
that I know whether to close the bug.  Thanks.

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]