[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:54:51 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> It may be suboptimal,
> What is the optimal behaviour in your opinion?
The optimal behavior depends on the user's intention, here.
Calendar can't know it. So it should just strive to make it easy for
the user to get what she wants.
> This whole exercise seems to have been a waste of time.
Yes, I'm sorry about it, but clearly the new "automatic double split" is
not a good idea: sometimes it may correspond to what the user wanted,
but I expect it'll be rare, and as mentioned, it's a lot easy for those
users to hit C-x 3 before invoking calendar, than for the rest of them
to undo the damage. KISS.
Stefan
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, (continued)
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2009/10/06
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Glenn Morris, 2009/10/06
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Stefan Monnier, 2009/10/06
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2009/10/06
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Glenn Morris, 2009/10/06
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2009/10/12
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Glenn Morris, 2009/10/12
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2009/10/13
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2009/10/14
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2009/10/15