[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:09:29 +0200 |
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
> Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>, 5162@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com,
> svenjoac@gmx.de
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:59:19 -0500
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > I agree. Does anyone know why, and which change(s) caused this?
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-10/msg00117.html
Thanks for the reminder.
> If no good solution can be found, it can be reverted at no great loss.
Maybe we should. Having loaddefs.el depend on the particulars of the
build will definitely open a can of worms, because *.el files are
generally considered architecture and build independent. For example,
does it still work to invoke Emacs built with X with the -nw option?
In general, if some build-dependent set of autoloads is skipped, then
how can we be sure that a binary which supports two different
configurations will work?
- bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build, (continued)
- bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/10
- bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build, Sven Joachim, 2009/12/10
- bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/10
- bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build, Sven Joachim, 2009/12/10
- bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build, Glenn Morris, 2009/12/21
bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/10
bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/12/10
bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build, Glenn Morris, 2009/12/10
bug#5162: 23.1.90; display-time broken in non-X build,
Eli Zaretskii <=