[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8628: [Emacs-bug-tracker] Processed: severity 8628 wishlist
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#8628: [Emacs-bug-tracker] Processed: severity 8628 wishlist |
Date: |
Sun, 15 May 2011 09:19:24 -0700 |
Apparently replying to this mail is a no-no. Has the thread effectively become
/dev/null for the user? Hopefully changing to <bugno>@debbugs.gnu.org will get
through...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: emacs-bug-tracker-bounces+drew.adams=oracle.com@gnu.org
> [mailto:emacs-bug-tracker-bounces+drew.adams=oracle.com@gnu.org]
> On Behalf Of GNU bug Tracking System
> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 7:26 AM To: Chong Yidong
> Cc: tracker@debbugs.gnu.org
> Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] Processed: severity 8628 wishlist
>
> Processing commands for control@debbugs.gnu.org:
>
> > severity 8628 wishlist
> > Bug #8628 [emacs] 24.0.50;
> > `thing-at-point-bounds-of-list-at-point' - no good
> > Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
>
> > thanks
> Stopping processing here.
>
> Please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org if you need assistance.
>
> GNU bugs database, http://debbugs.gnu.org/
My (apparently disallowed) reply is this:
Why? I _provided the fix_ already. You don't even need a patch.
Just remove `thing-at-point-bounds-of-list-at-point' and the
`(put 'list 'bounds-of-thing-at-point
'thing-at-point-bounds-of-list-at-point)',
as I said earlier.
That cruft serves no purpose. It just introduces the buggy behavior.
`(bound-of-thing-at-point 'list)' is sufficient - it already does what's needed.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#8628: [Emacs-bug-tracker] Processed: severity 8628 wishlist,
Drew Adams <=