[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedica
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:50:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> 1. I don't think you are in Icicle mode when testing.
> Did you do `M-x icy-mode' at the start, to get in the mode?
No.
> I mentioned that you can try the same test (starting from Emacs startup each
> time) both in and out of Icicle mode, to see the difference. If not in Icicle
> mode then you will not see the bug.
>
> 2. If you are in Icicle mode then you won't even get to `foo' after hitting
`M-x
> f TAB'.
>
> After starting Emacs as I indicated and getting into Icicle mode, when you hit
> `M-x f TAB' the Completions frame is created and it incorrectly gets the input
> focus. When you then hit `o' you get the read-only error.
>
> It is important to test from scratch: no Completions frame or buffer, not even
> iconified. Then just type `M-x f TAB o'.
I see it now. The Completions buffer pop ups up in a normal frame instead.
> Note that even in Emacs 23, where there is no such bug, when you complete to
> footnote-mode in Icicle mode the Completions frame is not iconified. It is
> instead deleted.
I attached a fixed copy of window.el, please try it. Completing now
deletes the Completions frame. I also restored the old meaning of the
third argument of `display-buffer' for the described frame values.
martin
window.zip
Description: Zip archive
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/23
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/24
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/24
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/26
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/26
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/26
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/26