[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#3516: 23.0.94; function key names in Info
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#3516: 23.0.94; function key names in Info |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:00:02 +0300 |
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:47:09 +0200
> Cc: 3516@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
>
> > We see things like <F1>, <F2>, <RET>, and <ESC> without single
> > quotes. Similarly, in other parts of the manual.
> >
> > Shouldn't those be `<f1>', `<f2>', `<RET>', and `<ESC>'?
>
> That might be argued, but the difference you're seeing is the difference
> between these two markups:
>
> @kbd{C-h}
> @key{F1}
Yes, that's true. "@key{F1}" in Texinfo produces "<F1>" in Info,
without the single quotes. In the printed output it produces
something resembling a keyboard key with a label on it. Taking these
in quotes would be wrong, e.g. because then "@kbd{C-x @key{RET}}"
would produce `C-x `<RET>'' with nested quotes which looks ugly.
- bug#3516: 23.0.94; function key names in Info, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/07/12
- bug#3516: 23.0.94; function key names in Info,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#3516: 23.0.94; function key names in Info, Drew Adams, 2011/07/12
- bug#3516: 23.0.94; function key names in Info, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/07/12
- bug#3516: 23.0.94; function key names in Info, Drew Adams, 2011/07/12
- bug#3516: 23.0.94; function key names in Info, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/07/12
- bug#3516: 23.0.94; function key names in Info, Drew Adams, 2011/07/12
- bug#3516: 23.0.94; function key names in Info, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/07/12