[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11508: 24.1.50; Off-by-one error in xg_select?
From: |
Jan Djärv |
Subject: |
bug#11508: 24.1.50; Off-by-one error in xg_select? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2012 07:30:06 +0200 |
Hello.
Go ahead and make the change.
Jan D.
21 maj 2012 kl. 00:44 skrev Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>:
> On 5/19/2012 5:52 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Jan Djärv<jan.h.d@swipnet.se> writes:
>>
>>> So the question is, is it more effective to give select the exact value
>>> (select works fine if nfds has a higher value than strictly neccessary),
>>> or always increment by one in lines 78 and 83?
>>
>> IMHO it doesn't hurt to be exact, and the patch removes an inconsistency
>> which makes it easier to understand the code.
>
> So can I go ahead and make this change? Jan, do you still object?
>
> Ken