[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11567: 24.0.97; WTF? ROFL! (hilarious bug)
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#11567: 24.0.97; WTF? ROFL! (hilarious bug) |
Date: |
Mon, 28 May 2012 12:26:36 +0200 |
> I propose the following patch, which does a little more checking if
> it's likely that emacs has been opening a special frame for the
> *Completions*-buffer. With some effort you could probably still get
> emacs to iconify an unexpecting frame, but I don't think many people
> would, if not for playing hide and seek that is... ;)
Why can't we use `window--delete' instead of `iconify-frame' here?
martin
- bug#11567: 24.0.97; WTF? ROFL! (hilarious bug), Tobias Bading, 2012/05/27
- bug#11567: 24.0.97; WTF? ROFL! (hilarious bug), Troels Nielsen, 2012/05/27
- bug#11567: 24.0.97; WTF? ROFL! (hilarious bug),
martin rudalics <=
- bug#11567: 24.0.97; WTF? ROFL! (hilarious bug), Stefan Monnier, 2012/05/28
- bug#11567: 24.0.97; WTF? ROFL! (hilarious bug), martin rudalics, 2012/05/28
- bug#11567: 24.0.97; WTF? ROFL! (hilarious bug), Troels Nielsen, 2012/05/28
- bug#11567: 24.0.97; WTF? ROFL! (hilarious bug), martin rudalics, 2012/05/29
- bug#11567: 24.0.97; WTF? ROFL! (hilarious bug), Chong Yidong, 2012/05/29