|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#13708: 24.3.50; icomplete, ido, iswitchb: Replace C-s, C-r with C-. and C-, |
Date: | Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:12:26 +0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 14.02.2013 8:54, Jambunathan K wrote:
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:This bug superseds http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13602 There seems to be a general agreement that C-s and C-r are too useful to be superseded by icomplete, ido and iswitchb(?).How exactly the default bindings for C-s and C-r are supposed to be used in ido-mode?I don't know. Just not use C-s and C-r at all.
What if the user tries to use them? By reflex, or out of exploratory interest.
I tried removing the overridded keybindings like you suggested, but C-s still doesn't really work after that, the interface is half-ido, half-isearch. That's bad.
So, I'm against removing them.
Or Introduce two defcustoms of type :key-sequence *shared* across the three libraries (ido, iswithcb and icomplete). and set them to C-. and C-, I don't know what solution would be best here. Nothing wrong to discuss, I suppose.I am proposing C-, and C-. as useful defaults.I think you are not objecting to this.
I don't have anything against these specific keybindings, except if C-s and C-r are not removed, they will be extraneous.
Not much of a problem, I guess.
For fear of resentment, I am leaving C-s and C-r bindings intact. Reviewer may delete them at his own discretion.I am in favor of deletion.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |