[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install
From: |
Leo Liu |
Subject: |
bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install |
Date: |
Mon, 06 May 2013 09:54:18 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.8.3) |
On 2013-05-06 08:20 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote:
> I'm not trying to difficult, but I really would like to know what this
> version scheme means. Could you explain it? Is 1.01 the same as 1.1,
> just written differently for sorting purposes? (IIUC, you added both ack
> and sokoban.)
It was supposed to mean 1.1 but padded with 0. I was thinking 1.9 is
written as 1.09 and it is clearly smaller than 1.10 etc. But 1.04 was
the number used by xemacs and I have no idea why it was picked up.
Leo
- bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install, chad, 2013/05/02
- bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install, Glenn Morris, 2013/05/03
- bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install, Leo Liu, 2013/05/03
- bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install, Glenn Morris, 2013/05/03
- bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install, Glenn Morris, 2013/05/03
- bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install, Leo Liu, 2013/05/03
- bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install, Glenn Morris, 2013/05/04
- bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install, Glenn Morris, 2013/05/04
- bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install, Leo Liu, 2013/05/04
- bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install, Glenn Morris, 2013/05/05
- bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install,
Leo Liu <=