[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be call
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel" |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:07:16 -0700 (PDT) |
> > FWIW, looking at the change I've had the same reaction as Drew.
>
> Well, it was the best short formulation that came to my mind.
...
> The "shortish" part is the problem.
Is this short enough and clear enough?
"Consider using `make-local-variable' instead"
The context (line #) should make it clear what the "instead" refers to.
This way we're just drawing the user's attention to the possibility
that it might be more appropriate to use `make-local-variable' in that
context. It's up to the user to check what that means, by checking the
doc.
If we could include a reference to the manual that would be even better.
The node is (elisp) `Creating Buffer-Local'. If a link is not possible
then perhaps just add text. Is this too long (dunno)?
"Consider using `make-local-variable' instead [(elisp) Creating Buffer-Local]
(Yes, links or textual references from product to doc can mean more
maintenance, unless they can be updated automatically. But they can
help users.)
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Michael Heerdegen, 2013/08/15
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/15
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Michael Heerdegen, 2013/08/15
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Glenn Morris, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Drew Adams, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Juanma Barranquero, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Michael Heerdegen, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel",
Drew Adams <=
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Michael Heerdegen, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Drew Adams, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Stefan Monnier, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Juanma Barranquero, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Drew Adams, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Glenn Morris, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Michael Heerdegen, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Glenn Morris, 2013/08/16
- bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel", Michael Heerdegen, 2013/08/16