[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:46:00 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, 16752@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:27:49 -0500
>
> After thinking some more about it, I wonder, tho: why don't we just make
> deactivate-mark buffer-local?
During a feature freeze? Who knows what this will break?
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, (continued)
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Stefan Monnier, 2014/02/14
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/14
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Stefan Monnier, 2014/02/14
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/15
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Stefan Monnier, 2014/02/16
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/17
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Stefan Monnier, 2014/02/17
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Stefan Monnier, 2014/02/17
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Helmut Eller, 2014/02/18
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/18
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Helmut Eller, 2014/02/18
- bug#16752: 24.3.50; pp-to-string deactivates mark, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/18