[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:36:22 +0100 |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Stefan Monnier
<monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> [ The X-Debbugs-Cc should be in the email header, not in the here
> pseudo-header. Welcome to Debbugs ;-) ]
[ It works here too. At least it worked all other times I've used it ;-) ]
> I don't understand what this means. Why would the frame's root window
> not be alive? Is it because it's an "internal" window (because of
> a split)?
Yes.
> deleting a frame and creating a new one is definitely not
> a good idea, since it can have all kinds of unintended side-effects,
> depending on the window manager.
I just committed a workaround for this issue: deleting all windows
except the first one in the relevant frame if its root window isn't
alive.
But I still think that getting a window-state for a window and putting
it again into the same window should always be allowed, unless Martin
has a good reason why that symmetry is a bad idea.
bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window, Stefan Monnier, 2014/02/18
- bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window, martin rudalics, 2014/02/18
- bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/02/18
- bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window, martin rudalics, 2014/02/18
- bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/02/18
- bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window, martin rudalics, 2014/02/19
- bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/02/19
bug#16793: window-state-put needs a live window, martin rudalics, 2014/02/18