[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt |
Date: |
Tue, 13 May 2014 22:54:08 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
> Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 17411@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 15:32:13 -0400
>
> The "eassert (length (i) > 0)" does catch this case already. We could
> add another assert which is looser (i.e. one that would not be caught by
> a "somewhat sane interval with a non-positive length"), but I'm not sure
> how to formally define "hopelessly messed up".
You could display the values on your system in a debugger, and after
some time you should have a good idea what isn't messed up.
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Drew Adams, 2014/05/05
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/05/07
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/11
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/11
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/12
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/12
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/12
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/13
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/13
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/13
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/13
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Drew Adams, 2014/05/14
- bug#17411: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/05/14